TaCCIRe Repository

Influence of forestland tenure regimes on forest condition and community livelihoods in the Uluguru Mountains, Tanzania

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kitula, Mariam Mohamed
dc.date.accessioned 2015-04-02T02:11:28Z
dc.date.available 2015-04-02T02:11:28Z
dc.date.issued 2011
dc.identifier.citation Kitula, M. M. (2011). Influence of forestland tenure regimes on forest condition and community livelihoods in the Uluguru Mountains, Tanzania. MSc Thesis. Morogoro: Sokoine University of Agriculture. en_GB
dc.identifier.uri http://www.taccire.sua.ac.tz/handle/123456789/353
dc.description This thesis is also available in print en_GB
dc.description.abstract Uluguru Mountains are dominated by different forestland tenure regimes, but is not known which one has more positive influence on forest condition and community livelihoods. This study was conducted with the objective of assessing their influence on forest condition and community livelihoods. Data were collected through forest inventory, participatory rural appraisal and questionnaire survey. Microsoft excel was used to analyse inventory data. Livelihoods data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences. The study showed that for the montane vegetation, state regime (Uluguru Nature Reserve) had higher stocking (volume 1233m3/ha; basal area 78m2/ha; density 777 stems/ha) compared to communal regime (Chief Kingalu Sacred Forest) with volume 798m3/ha; basal area 49m2/ha; density 1020 stems/ha. For the miombo vegetation, corporate/private (Tangeni Roman Catholic Church Forest Reserve) had higher stocking (volume 122m3/ha; basal area 27m2/ha and density 2573 stems/ha) compared to communal regime (Misumba Village Forest Reserve) with volume 23m3/ha; basal area 10.8m2/ha and density 4200 stems/ha. The most prominent tenure regime with regard to contribution to livelihoods capitals was the state. Financial capital as the surrogate livelihoods indicator was enabled or constrained by a number of socio-economic and institutional factors. Enabling socio-economic factors included market demand, hunger duration and household size whereas constraining socioeconomic factors included education level, distance from homestead to the forest, land size and sex of head of household. Enabling institutional factor was rule violation. Constraining institutional factors included prohibition from entering the forest and forestland tenure insecurity. The study concludes that, state regime has successfully improved forest condition and livelihoods compared to other tenure regimes. It recommends that forest inventory should be conducted at predetermined intervals together with insuring tenure security and initiation of alternative source of income to the local people. en_GB
dc.language.iso en en_GB
dc.publisher Sokoine University of Agriculture (SUA) en_GB
dc.subject Uluguru Mountains en_GB
dc.subject Community livelihoods en_GB
dc.subject Livelihoods en_GB
dc.subject Forestland tenure regimes en_GB
dc.subject Forest condition en_GB
dc.title Influence of forestland tenure regimes on forest condition and community livelihoods in the Uluguru Mountains, Tanzania en_GB
dc.type Thesis en_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search TaCCIRe


Browse

My Account