TaCCIRe Repository

Establishing a baseline for monitoring and evaluating user satisfaction with climate services in Tanzania

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Daly, M.E.
dc.contributor.author West, J.J.
dc.contributor.author Yanda, P Z.
dc.date.accessioned 2016-10-24T12:25:03Z
dc.date.available 2016-10-24T12:25:03Z
dc.date.issued 2016-03
dc.identifier.citation Daly, M.E. et al. (2016). Establishing a baseline for monitoring and evaluating user satisfaction with climate services in Tanzania. Oslo: CICERO (Center for International Climate and Environmental Research – Oslo) en_GB
dc.identifier.uri http://www.taccire.sua.ac.tz/handle/123456789/503
dc.description Also available online-URL-http://www.cicero.uio.no en_GB
dc.description.abstract Climate Services; Tanzania; User satisfaction; Baseline; Salience; Credibility; Legitimacy This report is an output from the Global Framework for Climate Services Adaptation Program in Africa (GFCS-APA) Tanzania country activities. The aim of the report is to establish a baseline for monitoring “User Satisfaction with Climate Services” at the national, district, and local levels, with a focus on the programme target districts of Longido and Kiteto. A qualitative approach was employed to document 1) existing institutional coordination and steering mechanisms for a dedicated climate services platform at the national level; 2) respondents’ awareness of and access to climate information and services at national, district and local levels; 3) respondents’ perceptions of the ‘usability’ of climate information and services, and 4) the role of indigenous knowledge (IK) about weather, climate, and related adaptation options. Following Cash et al., (2003), we analyzed “user satisfaction” in relation to respondents’ perceptions of the credibility, salience, and legitimacy of climate information and services. Key findings include: 1) A national steering mechanism for climate services has been adopted, but there is a need to strengthen institutional coordination across all scales; 2) Awareness of and access to climate information and services are highly variable across institutional scales, indicating a need for increased awareness of the concept of climate services as well as efforts to enhance delivery of climate information; 3) Perceptions of the credibility of climate information and services are paramount to increasing user satisfaction, and depend upon respondents’ experience using climate information in practice. Mismatches between the timing of decision-making and the production and delivery of forecasts, as well as the limited spatial and temporal resolution of climate information and products, undermine the salience of climate information. The way in which forecasts are currently packaged andcommunicated presents additional challenges to understanding and interpreting the information for practical decision-making. At the local level, disparities in capacities to access and benefit from climate information and services and the potential for climate information to take on political implications when attached to specific advice pose challenges to the legitimacy of climate information and services development. 4) IK was seen as being particularly important to decision-making at local levels, where it gains its credibility through the long-term observations it is based on, as well as the experience that communities already have working with this knowledge. Incorporating IK within climate services development is necessary to enhance the legitimacy of the processes and the applicability of the knowledge that is generated to local decision-making, but there are a number of challenges to incorporating scientific and indigenous knowledges. The findings highlight that improving user satisfaction with climate services will be a long-term process that requires capacity building among producers, intermediaries, and users at all levels, particularly to promote innovation in delivery, communication, and tailoring of climate services products. Developing knowledge that is salient, credible, and legitimate in particular decision-making contexts will also require long-term collaboration, as well as transparency about the strengths and limitations of scientific information and open dialogue about the various ways in which stakeholders at different scales assess the credibility of climate information. Based on the analysis, the authors put forward twelve recommendations to improve user satisfaction with climate information and services in Tanzania in the future. en_GB
dc.description.sponsorship The Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs :Global Framework for Climate Services Adaptation Programme in Africa en_GB
dc.language.iso en en_GB
dc.publisher CICERO Center for International Climate and Environmental Research-Oslo en_GB
dc.subject Climate services en_GB
dc.subject User satisfaction en_GB
dc.subject Baseline en_GB
dc.subject Salience en_GB
dc.subject Credibility en_GB
dc.subject Legitimacy en_GB
dc.subject Tanzania en_GB
dc.subject User Satisfaction with Climate Services en_GB
dc.subject Longido district en_GB
dc.subject Kiteto district en_GB
dc.title Establishing a baseline for monitoring and evaluating user satisfaction with climate services in Tanzania en_GB
dc.type Technical Report en_GB

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search TaCCIRe


My Account